| 1 |
Request a complete stability protocol |
Study design, batch numbers, packaging configuration, test intervals, analytical methods, and acceptance criteria. |
A written protocol aligned with recognized stability principles, including long-term, accelerated, and, where applicable, intermediate conditions. |
Only a single test result or a generic statement that the material is “stable.” |
| 2 |
Review long-term stability conditions |
Temperature, relative humidity, duration, sampling schedule, and whether the study reflects the intended market climate. |
Common ICH long-term conditions include 25°C ± 2°C/60% RH ± 5% RH or 30°C ± 2°C/65% RH ± 5% RH, depending on the applicable climatic zone. |
Long-term data generated only under undefined or uncontrolled room conditions. |
| 3 |
Check accelerated stability testing |
Exposure to elevated temperature and humidity, test duration, and documented changes in assay, impurities, color, or physical properties. |
A commonly used accelerated condition is 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% RH for 6 months, when appropriate for the product and study purpose. |
Accelerated testing is presented as a substitute for real-time stability data. |
| 4 |
Assess the analytical methods |
Method specificity, accuracy, precision, linearity, detection capability, and ability to distinguish melatonin from degradation products. |
A stability-indicating, validated chromatographic method should be used for assay and related-substance evaluation. |
Testing relies only on non-specific appearance or a method that cannot separate degradation products. |
| 5 |
Verify expiration-date justification |
How the expiry period was assigned, including batch history, trend analysis, packaging, and any extrapolation. |
The expiry date should be supported by real-time stability data and documented statistical or scientific evaluation rather than a fixed administrative period. |
The same shelf life is applied to every product without considering formulation, packaging, or storage conditions. |
| 6 |
Evaluate packaging protection |
Container-closure system, moisture barrier, light protection, seal integrity, and compatibility with the melatonin material. |
Stability data should be generated in the same or equivalent packaging used for shipment and storage; light-sensitive materials should be assessed under photostability conditions where relevant. |
Stability data use an opaque laboratory container that differs from the commercial shipping package. |
| 7 |
Confirm storage and transport controls |
Defined temperature and humidity limits, monitoring devices, alarm response, shipping qualification, and excursion procedures. |
Storage instructions must match the stability study. Temperature-controlled areas should have calibrated monitoring and documented excursion assessment. |
“Store in a cool, dry place” is used without numerical limits, monitoring records, or excursion handling. |
| 8 |
Review batch-to-batch consistency |
Number of stability batches, manufacturing dates, lot sizes, assay trends, impurity profiles, and physical observations. |
Prefer data from multiple representative batches, with results reported at several time points rather than only at release. |
Stability conclusions are based on one non-representative or unusually small batch. |
| 9 |
Check quality-system documentation |
Change control, deviation management, out-of-specification investigation, data integrity, calibration, and document retention. |
Records should be attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original or appropriately controlled, accurate, complete, and readily retrievable. |
Missing raw data, unexplained corrections, inconsistent dates, or unavailable investigation reports. |
| 10 |
Establish incoming-lot verification |
Identity, assay, related substances, water content where relevant, appearance, packaging condition, and certificate-of-analysis traceability. |
Use a risk-based sampling and testing plan; verify each lot against agreed specifications and retain representative samples under defined conditions. |
Certificates of analysis are accepted without lot-level verification or review of deviations and trends. |